<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Packaging Picks for November</title>
	<atom:link href="http://packaginguniversity.com/blog/2009/11/30/packaging-picks-for-november/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://packaginguniversity.com/blog/2009/11/30/packaging-picks-for-november/</link>
	<description>The Packaging Diva&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 21:33:01 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica</title>
		<link>http://packaginguniversity.com/blog/2009/11/30/packaging-picks-for-november/comment-page-1/#comment-6364</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 15:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packaginguniversity.com/blog/?p=1140#comment-6364</guid>
		<description>It is very interesting to see the varitey of shapes businesses are using for their packaging. Who knew water could be bottled in a circle and milk could be packaged into a square.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is very interesting to see the varitey of shapes businesses are using for their packaging. Who knew water could be bottled in a circle and milk could be packaged into a square.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: packagingdiva</title>
		<link>http://packaginguniversity.com/blog/2009/11/30/packaging-picks-for-november/comment-page-1/#comment-5980</link>
		<dc:creator>packagingdiva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packaginguniversity.com/blog/?p=1140#comment-5980</guid>
		<description>Great points about the PLA debate. The media spin is all about these &quot;eco alternatives&quot; but you never hear about opposing point of view, It is true that we need to rethink the packaging paradigm including all the R&#039;s: Reduce, reuse, recycle, repurpose, renew, refill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great points about the PLA debate. The media spin is all about these &#8220;eco alternatives&#8221; but you never hear about opposing point of view, It is true that we need to rethink the packaging paradigm including all the R&#8217;s: Reduce, reuse, recycle, repurpose, renew, refill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lee newham</title>
		<link>http://packaginguniversity.com/blog/2009/11/30/packaging-picks-for-november/comment-page-1/#comment-5978</link>
		<dc:creator>lee newham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packaginguniversity.com/blog/?p=1140#comment-5978</guid>
		<description>Are the plastic bottles made from plastic (as in oil) or PLA/cornstarch? There is a big debate whether PLA is better than alternatives. As for the comment about recycling, recycling only extends a products life. You can&#039;t recycle a product into the same product, you are essentially downcycling. It&#039;s well worth reading the book Cradle to Cradle.

It should go in this order:
REDUCE
REUSE
RECYCLE

Interesting post PD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are the plastic bottles made from plastic (as in oil) or PLA/cornstarch? There is a big debate whether PLA is better than alternatives. As for the comment about recycling, recycling only extends a products life. You can&#8217;t recycle a product into the same product, you are essentially downcycling. It&#8217;s well worth reading the book Cradle to Cradle.</p>
<p>It should go in this order:<br />
REDUCE<br />
REUSE<br />
RECYCLE</p>
<p>Interesting post PD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Innovative Packaging Shaping Our Lives W/O 7/5 &#124; Packaging News You Can Use</title>
		<link>http://packaginguniversity.com/blog/2009/11/30/packaging-picks-for-november/comment-page-1/#comment-5950</link>
		<dc:creator>Innovative Packaging Shaping Our Lives W/O 7/5 &#124; Packaging News You Can Use</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 13:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packaginguniversity.com/blog/?p=1140#comment-5950</guid>
		<description>[...] shape sell! Some more interesting shapes. You bet! and in this case it helps reinforce the brand image too.&#160; Who wouldn&#8217;t [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] shape sell! Some more interesting shapes. You bet! and in this case it helps reinforce the brand image too.&nbsp; Who wouldn&#8217;t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charlie</title>
		<link>http://packaginguniversity.com/blog/2009/11/30/packaging-picks-for-november/comment-page-1/#comment-5799</link>
		<dc:creator>charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packaginguniversity.com/blog/?p=1140#comment-5799</guid>
		<description>This is really awesome and I am glad that you have shared the information, thank you very much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really awesome and I am glad that you have shared the information, thank you very much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Packaging USA</title>
		<link>http://packaginguniversity.com/blog/2009/11/30/packaging-picks-for-november/comment-page-1/#comment-5794</link>
		<dc:creator>Packaging USA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 13:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packaginguniversity.com/blog/?p=1140#comment-5794</guid>
		<description>In my opinion, for events like yours, “real” plastic is better, as it can be fully recycled into another product and none of the plastic particles ends up in a landfill. Also, no chemicals need to be used to coat the plastic prior to use.

This product, to me, is greenwashing at it’s best. There is no such thing as “eco” plastic that is made from petroleum, no matter what anyone does to it. Thanks

Regards,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, for events like yours, “real” plastic is better, as it can be fully recycled into another product and none of the plastic particles ends up in a landfill. Also, no chemicals need to be used to coat the plastic prior to use.</p>
<p>This product, to me, is greenwashing at it’s best. There is no such thing as “eco” plastic that is made from petroleum, no matter what anyone does to it. Thanks</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://packaginguniversity.com/blog/2009/11/30/packaging-picks-for-november/comment-page-1/#comment-5793</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 09:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packaginguniversity.com/blog/?p=1140#comment-5793</guid>
		<description>If ever a design suggested a reuse at Xmas, OGO does.

A year of drinking and you have your decorations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If ever a design suggested a reuse at Xmas, OGO does.</p>
<p>A year of drinking and you have your decorations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

